Wednesday, 26 April 2017

Restore the bursary for student nurses now!

The Labour Party has announced that it intends to restore the bursary paid to student nurses. The Barnet Eye totally agrees with this policy and thinks it is scandalous that it was ever abolished. Lumbering nurses with huge debts, given the role that they play in the health and wellbeing of the nation is immoral. Not only that, it is short sighted. The NHS already relies on immigrant Labour to function and financially penalising young people keen to work in a caring profession will only make this skills shortage worse. Personally, I believe we should return to a full grant for all students, because in the 21st Century the UK can only succeed with a well educated and intelligent workforce. This is investment in the future, not simply throwing money down a black hole (like some public spending such as allowances for Barnet Councillors at £1 Million a year and the Garden Bridge at nearly two hundred million).

Sooner or later we will all need nurses. I personally want the people who care for me as I lay dying to be valued and respect members of society, not debt straddled wage slaves, struggling to get by. It is simply called basic decency.

Tuesday, 25 April 2017

The great HS2 Rip Off and how the the Conservative government guarantee profits for private monopolies

The Evenimng Standard is reporting that there has been an outcry as the French Government owned operator SNCF has tabled a bid to run the HS2 service when it has been built (with UK Taxpayers money). Union leaders are furious that the taxpayer has paid to build the line, but the French taxpayers will reap the profits. Whilst I find this proposition ridiculous, there is another scandal that the Standard and the Unions have missed altogether. It appears that HS2 and the existing West Coast franchise are going to all be rolled up into one big franchise. One of the attractions for me of the HS2 service was that it offered the prospect of more competition on the London to Birmingham route. This is one of the busiest services and by splitting the two routes, I saw the possibility of competition forcing down prices of fast train travel between the two cities. Whilst the HS2 services would undoubtedly be faster, trains running over the existing route are not slow and for many people, savings on fares would be a price worth paying for a few extra minutes. This would force the HS2 route to also sharpen up its act. However by rolling the whole lot up into one franchise, the lucky winner will be able to rig the prices so the taxpaying commuters, who paid for the line to be built, have to stump up a premium fare.

This is not completely unprecedented. In May 2003, there was a huge refurbishment of the existing West Coast railway. For a period of eighteen months, there were very limited routes over the line to Manchester. The rail regulator realised that this would be bad for Britain, so they made the then operator of the Midland Mainline service, from St Pancras, to set up a direct service from St Pancras to Manchester.  This lasted until September 2004. This service proved popular, especially in the East Midlands, where many people appreciated a direct service to Manchester. However despite the fact that this service could be accomodated, offered the prospect of competition on the route and was popular, the rail regulator insisted it was closed down at the end of the engineering works. There was never the slightest chance that having seen there was a potential for a better deal for passengers, a rival service would be allowed to flourish. The reason? Rail Franchises are nice little earners. They are not designed to improve the lot of passengers. They are designed to make big profits for operators. If passengers decided it was worth an extra half an hour on the train to save a decent amount of cash, then that would be no good at all, would it? If that started to happen, dodgy operators would have to start upping their game.

Let me give you an example. I took two journeys of similar distance. London to Iswich and London to Bedford, leaving at 6pm today. The cheapest ticket on the Trainline to Ipswich  was £49.20 and it takes 1hour and 11 mins. The journey London to Bedford takes 57 minutes and costs £23.60. Why is a journey taking only 14 minutes longer more than twice the cost? It may seem puzzling until you realsie that on the Ipswich route, there is only one operator. That is Greater Anglia. On the London to Bedford route, there are two operators, Thameslink and East Midlands Trains. It is clear that if there is competition, prices are lower. An even starker example is the cost of a train from St Pancras to Wellingborough. This is the next stop up the line from Bedford, but is only served by East Midlands trains. For that extra hop, the cost rises to £57.00. If you were to buy two tickets, one from London to Bedford it's £23.60. The ticket from Bedford to Wellingborough is a mere £10.50, realising a saving of nearly £23.

This whole mad system is a product of a Conservative obsession with privatisation. Does this serve the passengers or the rich companies? Clearly not. However because they couldn't possibly admit that British Rail, a nationalised entity, could be better value, we are forced to pay through the nose to subsidise companies owned by foreign governments. The Tories may preach Brexit, but they are happy to sell the crown jewels!



Monday, 24 April 2017

Local Festival Update & BANDS/ARTISTS SOUGHT FOR LOCAL FESTIVALS

We have some exciting news.  The Barnet Eye has been asked to help arrange artists and promote  two great local music festivals! We are also helping to promote a third one, so check out the details below for details of some great music happening in our own little corner of London! ( And don't forget that if you are an artist, rehearsals are the key to success.Visit the Mill Hill Music Complex site to Book Now! - Mill Hill Music Complex are sponsoring all three events)

#Save London Music! #KeepMusicLive


North Finchley Festival

The North Finchley Festival is happening on Sat 20st and Sun 21st of May. Venues involved are The Bohemia, The Elephants Head, Cafe Buzz, M's, Chix Chox and Toolins. The cafe/bar places are looking for solo and duo's who are appropriate for a cafe environment. The pubs are looking for suitable bands, who have a bit of a track record of playing local venues. The organisers are hopingto relaunch North Finchley as a go to music destination (may of us remember The Torrington as a well established London pub rock venue)
Please provide name of band/artist, style of music, cocial media links, list of gigs played, number of performers, set length and style of music. And keep an eye out for full details, which will be announced shortly.


Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum Summer Festival in Mill Hill Broadway

Save the date for the Mill Hill Neighbourhood Forum, Mill Hill Summer Festival on Friday 16 June and Saturday 17 June. Mill Hill town centre will be celebrating summer with live music, entertainment, a food and gift market, and a buzzing bar!
Mill Hill Music Complex is organising artists for the stage, so please contact them via their website if you are interested in playing. Must be suitable for a mixed age family audience. Expenses will be paid.
Also, please get in touch for more information about becoming a stallholder at this and other Mill Hill town centre events.
For more information contact Osita Udenson at Vibe Markets 


The 12th Mill Hill Music Festival

June 16th-24th sees the return of the bi-annual Mill Hill Music Festival. We've got all of the artists now lined up and there will be some great gigs over the nine days of the Festival.
As always we will have a selection of Later@ evenings at local pubs and a fantastic evening of rock and roll classics from Recollection and our headline ska band, The Silencerz featuring Lee Thompson of Madness fame at Mill Hill Golf Club on Friday 23rd June. Mill Hill. We also have local legend Alan Warner, from the Foundations at the Adam and Eve on Saturday 24th, which is Free Entry.

Who says weak leaders are such a bad thing?

One of  Theresa May and the Conservatives main charges against Jeremy Corbyn is that hes a "weak leader". May claims she needs a strong mandate to negotiate a good Brexit deal and she needs to do this from a position of strength. What is interesting is that no one seems to be challengig the basic premise that strong leaders are a good thing. I see no clear evidence to support this, certainly not in peacetime and in relation to complex, civilised negotiations. There is a stack of evidence to show that nations do better with weak leadership and government by consensus. This rather inconvenient fact is one of the most overlooked. There are dozens of examples and stacks of evidence that if you want your country to do well, you have weak leaders and political systems that involve bargaining and horse trading. Look at the USA. The founding fathers built so many checks and balances into place that it is virtually impossible for the president to do anything. Donald Trump is finding this out in rather short order. You can win the President Election, become the most powerful man on the planet, but you can't make the judge pass your travel ban, or make your congress pass your healthcare bill.  President Obama spent years getting the legislation through. Has this stopped the States becoming the richest and most powerful nation on the planet? Nope. The 20th Century was an American century. Over the course of the century, America faced down a whole host of all powerful leaders, Hitler, Hirohito, Stalin, Mao to name but a few.

The USA is not alone in benefitting from weak government. Who is the most powerful European leader? Surely Angela Merkel. She has lead a coalition government since 2005. Has the German economy floundered and have the German people suffered? Not as far as I can see. At the same time, we have Vladimir Putin in Russia. Here we have a strong man who has little effective opposition. Has this meant the Russian economy done well? No, it is in dire straights, propped up by Russia's massive natural resources. Have they done well in negotiaitions on difficult issues? No, Russia suffers sanctions.

In Belgium, there was a lengthy period where there was no government at all. Did the economy grind to a halt? Nope, in fact it went from strength to strength. As to the EU negotiations. If Theresa May thinks having a pliant parliament is an assett, she knows nothing about negotiations. If the EU think she has control of Parliament, they will be able to dictate terms. She'd be in a far stronger position if she could say "Well there is no point suggesting that because I'd never get it through Parliament". One of the oldest tricks in the book when negotiating is the "Fred says" tactic. This is based on the idea that if you are negotiationg you say "Well I'd love to sign up, but Fred would never agree to that". In this case Parliament is "Fred". Theresa May says no deal is better than a bad deal. This is a ridiculous thing to say. If I was negotiating, the first thing I'd say is that the only deal we will do is a good one and it is in everyones interests to do it. Theresa May seems to think that saying "If you don't give us what we want we'll walk away" is a good negotiating stance. It is not.  A good negotiating stance is one where you have the strength to know that no one would walk away from the table, because that would be insane. If Theresa May gets the 100 seat majority she wants, she will have no joker in the back pocket. She can't play the difficult Parliament card at all. If we don't have the cards to say "you'd be insane to walk away from the table" Then we should take a different tack.

Of course the election was nothing to do with Brexit. It was all to do with the Tories trying to grab a few more years, as Labour is perceived to be weak right now. May sems to think that a big majority silences the awkward squad. It does nothing of the sort. Tony Blair had massive majorities, but all it did was mean that there are more MP's who felt overlooked, more scope for personal rebellions, as MP's know that they can vote agaings their party, with no ramifications, it has nothing to lose and no discipline. If Blair had a 10 seat majority, he'd have had to tread carefully and would probably not have made the awful mistakes that trashed his legacy. But with the massive numbers, he need not worry about the awkward squad. Now, one of them, Jeremy Corbyn is the party leader. Blairs huge majority gave rise to the stresses and splits that created the state of Modern Labour.

I don't blame May for going for an election. She is a politician, her job is to do such things. She has had the albatross of not being elected around her neck. She needs authority and at the moment this is lacking. But what is required is a new manifesto, a new program of government and a set of coherant reasons for electing May. We've not had this and the evidence says that we need "Strong Leadership" is the mother of all red herrings.

Sunday, 23 April 2017

The joys of supporting Manchester City FC through thick and thin

Image may contain: 6 people, people standing and text
Manchester City FC
For Manchester City fans living outside of Manchester, perhaps the question you are asked most frequently and one which is probably the most annoying of all is "Why don't you support United?".  I doubt supporters of any other club are ever asked such a question. I once asked a London based Birmingham City fan if he'd ever been asked why he didn't support Villa. Now in my family, there is  a City/United split. My mum's family were born in Oldham and were City fans (my Dad was an Aussie so didn't do football). When they moved to London, they took the love of City with them. My eldest brother, raised in North London, started life as a Spurs fan, but defected to Manchester United, when he went to Uni, seduced by Charlton, Law and Best, Busby, the League Title and the European Cup. Many people in the mid '60's had a soft spot for United following the Munich crash and for a few seasons they became an acceptable second team. I'm a bit younger. I started to take an interest in Football when I was five. My brother tried to persuade me to support United, but I chose City. There were several reasons. Firstly, I was born with the rhesus syndrome, what was known as a "blue baby". How could I ever possibly be a Red? Secondly, in the 1960's we were told that blue was for boys. Thirdly, as the 1968 season came to it's cumination, City were playing United and the winner was odds on for the title. My brother persuaded me that United would stuff City and that would prove they were the better side. even though I was only five and my brother was twenty two, I realised that football presented an opportunity to get one up on him and wind him up. Imagine my delight when City won, and went on to win the title! I realised the delight of how pleasing it is to wind up Manchester United supporters. That is one pleasure that never goes away. For most of the next decade, life was good for the blues. Under Joe Mercer, City followed the League title with the FA cup, then the Cup Winners Cup and the League Cup. In 1974, United were relegated. That was a golden time in our house (for me at least).

However, supporting Manchester City is not about glory. It is about something far more important. At the end of the 1970's things turned sour. The nemises was 1999, when City were in League 2, going nowhere. For a while, it seemed like they would say there. For reasons I can't fathom, this was perhaps the period that I loved the club most. The supporters, who still turned out. When the football on the pitch was dire, we brought inflatables and had a party. At many away games, the away support outnumbered the locals, and several clubs were kept afloat that season by the  inflated gate takings.

The season finished with a play off final vs Gillingham. At the time,  I explained to my nephew Alex, that the best reason to support Manchester City rather than Manchester United, is that it prepares you for life and makes you a better person. To support City requires a sense of humour and strength through adversity, wheras to support United simply requires arrogance, a feeling that you are better than everyone else and a sense of entitlement. I took my nephew to the game. The efforts of Nicky Weaver and Paul Dickov ensured he saw the lights. That season United won the Treble, but for City fans, the play off final was a far more pivotal point. Had they lost, it felt like we'd be cast unto Hades itself. With 89 minutes, we were two goals down and playing appalling football. That was my last visit to the Old Wembley. No one there could imagine what the next couple of decades would bring, but that was the key moment. At 88 minutes, it seemed like we were doomed. Noel Gallagher famously stormed out. But we are Manchester City. The word impossible is alien to us. If we win we win impossibly. If we lose, we lose spectacularly. Under Mancini, I went to watch City at The Emirates. We were rubbish. With six games to go we'd blown the title. I left feeling truly depressed, the train carriage had City fans morosely saying we'd never win anythingunder Mancini. But as ever, with City, you have to lose your faith to find it. I wrte a song recently about the experience of being a football supporter, with Allen Ashley, (my co writer and a Gunners fan). It contains the line "Keep the faith, Always believe, take us to the top of the league". Sometimes it is only the gallows humour that makes that possible. I was at a City vs Bournemouth game at Maine Roaud in around '88. City were 3-0 up at half time. That was in the Harry Redknapp period at Bournmouth. The guy standing next to me was raving and saying "We really are back (we were in the 2nd tier), we are awesome". The game finished 3-3,with him vowing never to come back. A couple of weeks later, there he was. That is the life of a City fan.

Once more I head off to Wembley to watch the Blues, with a sense of trepidation and impending doom, mixed with excitement and expectation. If they lose, it will be "Damn, typical City" if they win, then the anxiety will simply shift to the forthcoming date with Chelsea. No other team are as capable of losing when it seems impossible and no other team would ever have that Aguero moment, with the camera moving to Fergies face as the truth dawns that the noisy neighbours have snatched the title with the last kick. That is how Premier league seasons should finish. As myself and Matthew sat watching the moment, completely emotionally drianed, Clare came in and said "Oh dear, so they lost then" we said "no they've won!". She said "Why aren't you happy then". I said "we are too drained". That is the life of a City supporter. #CTID

The Tweets of The Week in The London Borough of Barnet - 23/4/2017

It's been a momentous week in our blessed Nation. However, if like me, you are already sick of this election, you'll be pleased to know we are giving it a wide berth in our selection of Tweets. There is far more important things in our little island of sanity that is the London Borough of Barnet than such trivial matters as national electons.

1. We start with a rather sad tweet of Burnt Oak market, from the Burnt Oak Police. I remember the halcyon days of the bustle of Watling Market, when it was the place for meat, fish, records, bric-a-brac, pet accessories, cheap suits, towels & linen, and fruit and veg. Time moves on but, wheras places like Camden Market have reinvented themselves and attracted new business and young people, Burnt Oak market has simply rotted.

2. Fancy Taking part in the Hendon History Project?

3. The name of the rose? Anyone help Lucy Reynolds?

4. A local lad done well!

5. Barnet Rebel is being chirped at!

6. Congratulation to that little Rugby team down the way in Copthall. In the final of the European Cup. Well done lads, awesome. Looking forward to the open top bus down Mill Hill Broadway!

7.I think this is a rather good photograph!

8. Fancy a bit of Musical Theatre in Mill Hill

9. Any small business owners interested in a bit of networking in a relaxed atmosphere?

10. Strange goings on at North West London's finest studios



That's all folks

Saturday, 22 April 2017

The Saturday list #126 - 10 household words and phrases that have disappeared in my lifetime

This morning, I was awoken by the Jo and Simon show on BBC Radio London. They were discussing coal bunkers and whether there were any of the old concrete bunkers left in London. One of the callers mentioned that they kept "coal under the sink in the scullery". It got me thinking. We used to have a scullery, before my parents had "the extension" and created a large open plan kitchen. I can't remember the last time I heard the word scullery. Which, as it's Saturday, made me think of other words and phrases that have disappeared. The criteria I've used is whether my 16 year old son would be bemused by the word.

1. Scullery. This was a sort of mini kitchen, where the cooker and the sink wer kept, but there wasn't room to swing a cat.

2. Gas poker. We used to have a gas poker to light the coal fire in the front room. They were very popular.

3. The Mangle. My mum used to have a mangle to squeeze the water out of the washing. Famously she caught my elder brother Laurie putting worms through it when he was a toddler. These days we have tumble driers.

4. The Black and White Telly. In these days of flat screeens etc, the concept of a black and white telly to my kids is truly bizarre. My daughter asked once why people didn't like colour.

5. Storage Heaters. These were large electric radiators with big concrete blocks in. You put them on when the electricity was at "cheap rate" and they stayed warm all day.

6.  The airing cupboard. This was where the hot water tank was kept and it had a space above for drying items in the winter.

7. The outdoor loo. Before the extension, we had an outdoor toilet. I never quite figured out why, until I asked my dear old auntie. Before the days of central heating, double galzing etc, keeping the house warm in winter was difficult. You didnt want smells trapped that couldn't escape, so the loo was outside.

8.  Eiderdowns. There was a period oin the late 70's when everyone had an Eiderdown on their bed. Haven't heard the term for years.

9. The potting shed. In the 1960's people had potting sheds. I was never quite sure what happened in them.

10. Servents bells. We still have these, although they don't work. Odd really for a semi in Mill Hill!
 My daughter asked what it was recently and didn't believe me. I've kept it in place to remind me of our aristocratic past. All the rooms apart from the little "maids bedroom" had a bell.

Image may contain: indoor
Servents bells

Friday, 21 April 2017

The Friday Joke - 21/04/2017

A learned Rabbi is being interviewed by a Christian fundamentalist TV station, to give some proper historical context for the stories of the Old Testament. Towards the end of the interview, the young, charismatically charged interviewer decides to try his luck and ask a couple of questions on Jesus and the New Testament. First he asks the Rabbi 'Are you familiar with the New Testament?'. The old Rabbi replies 'Yes my son, it gives a fascinating insight into the mindset of my people 2,000 years ago'. The presenter then asks 'Why do you think Jesus became so popular?'. The old Rabbi laughed 'If you've ever had to pay for your sons Bahmitzvah or your daughters wedding, you'd invite Jesus too. Water into wine, the trick with the loaves and fishes, he'd be top of the list invited to all the parties!'.

Have a great weekend

Thursday, 20 April 2017

Is Facebook worse than heroin?


I'm not joking, I'm quite serious. I'm starting to think Facebook should be classified as a dangerous drug and one that is perhaps more corrosive than class A drugs such as heroin. Why? Here's a few reasons

1. It's legal
2. It's highly addictive.
3. It radically alters peoples behaviour.
4. It causes anti social behaviour.
5. It damages friendships and family life.
6. It places vulnerable people in the way of harm.

Let me put the evidence as I see it.

Legality.
It is quite clearly legal. There are no constraints on who can join and few constraints on what people can say and post. Sexually explicit pictures are banned, but more or less anything else is allowed. Of course we live in a society where free speech is valued, but we place legal constraints on drugs, because they damage society, so maybe we should have a long hard think on how we legilsate for social media. It is bizarre how people who resent intrusions into their privacy plaster all manner of personal information on social media.

2. It''s highly addictive. Not for everyone, but neither is heroin, cocaine or other illegal drugs, some people are casual users. There are, however people who seem to become completely obsessed with facebook and get edgy and nervous when they can't access it or post trivia about there life. I am sure any of us who has used it know people who become completely obsessed.

3. It definately alters peoples behaviour. I have a few friends who I've seen a complete transformation in their personality following facebook addiction. Some seem to have become obsessed with all manner of odd political causes, having previously shown no interest at all in the subject.

4. It causes terrible anti social behaviour. We all know people who harrass people and behave in the most awful way on social media platforms. The term troll is sadly one which we have had to learn to live with. There are also people who seem obsessed with reposting the most horrible material, posting pictures of animals and people suffering all manner of awful treatment. Often this is accompanied with "OMG, isn't this awful". Yes it is, don't repost it and encourage them.

5. Friendships and family life has been damaged for many people. This may be because partners hook up with exe's, it may be because disputes start over trivial subjects when people take umbrage at trivial comments.

6. Sadly many vulnerable people see Facebook as the windows to the world, as with everything else, there are predators out there who see Facebook as a useful tool. The company seems to have no interest in addressing these issues. For me, this is perhaps the most dangerous feature of all.

Do you agree?


Wednesday, 19 April 2017

This is not a single issue election.

A few thoughts on th choice we need to make in seven weeks, having slept on the issue and chewed the cud. Firstly, this isnot a single issue election, although Brexit is a big issue. If in 5 years time we have no NHS to speak of, a privatised education system and an even more inequitable society, Brexit will seem like a sideshow. The hard right of the Tories are seeing this as a golden opportunity to reshape the UK into a neocon fairyland. We have served article 50, so the Brexit negotiations will be done and dusted in 23 months. That means that whoever wins, will have another three years after that to do what they like, especially if they secure a large majority. Whilst I believe May was right to seek a mandate, she was highly dishonest about why she made the decision. She claimed that she had too much parliamentary resistance to her proposals, but anyone who follows Westminister will know she got a remarkably easy ride on passing the Brexit bill. Labour by and large had accepted the result of the referendum and was not being obstructive. Remember the difficulties John Major had with Maastricht treaty, if you want to talk difficult Parliaments. This is all about political gain and opportunism on behalf of the Tory Party.

As for Labour. There is a dispondence among many, especially on the Blairite wing.  They really need to man up. If they don't support Labour candidates, then they are behaving in a reprehensible manner. Labour needs an infusion of new MP's, because it is clear that many of the current ones are out of step with the party membership. Having said that, it will be bad for the country if there is no opposition so to speak of, therefore support the person you've got, not the person you want. In Barnet seats, candidates such as Sarah Sackman are clearly the face of the future for Labour. I agree that it is highly unlikely that Jeremy Corbyn will be the next PM, therefore we need intelligent and articulate people like Sarah to help shape the post Corbyn era. I suspect that the best any Labour supporter can realistically hope for is a Labour lead coalition. I suspect that Corbyn would not lead that, although that is a guess. But seven weeks is an eternity in Politics. Yesterday I was sitting here eating my porridge for breakfast thinking "what on earth will I be blogging abut this week". With May clearly being highly dishonest about her reasons for calling the election, it is not beyond the realms of possibility that the campaign will expose her as a shifty and untrustworthy politician who is also not noted as being a great campaigner. There is also a msss of young people who have swept Corbyn into power, who may well energise the campaign and deliver a shock. The received wisdom was that Remain would win and Clinton would brush Trump aside. The electorate had different ideas. Who's to say that it won't happen again.

The Lib Dems have an opportunity. Many good MP's lost their seats in the electoral purge that resulted from voters getting their revenge. However bad they may have seemed, to me it seems that what has followed is a million times worse. We need a strong voice for the 48% who believe in a future in partnership with Europe. Only the Lib Dems are speaking up for this. The Tories seem to be painting the Lib Dems as the party that is still stuck fighting the referendum, when the country has moved on. The trouble with this strategy is that I doubt many of the 48% have moved on and I also suspect a goodly percentage of the 52% may be having second thoughts. The Tories won a majority because they won dozens of seats from the Lib Dems. If the Lib Dems win these back, then the Tories dreams of huge majority may well prove to be a pipe dream and the concept that this election was a masterstroke may now look like David Camerons cunning plan to hold a referendum to shut up the leavers in the Tory Party. It is key to me that Lib Dems are the joker in the pack. I would be amazed if the Tory strategists don't have a cunning plan to shaft the Lib Dems, but we've seen how well they work.

Not that it affects Barnet, but we also have the SNP into the mix.  Will they maintain their stranglehold on Scottish politics. I suspect they'll lose a few seats, but will still be the dominant force north of the border. In the event of a coalition, they may well be the nemisis of Jeremy Corbyn. At the last election, Cameron won by scaring the life out of us with tales of Nicloa Sturgeon. I doubt that will work again.

Some have said that they are so disillusioned with the opposition that they are considering spoiling their ballot papers. This is the politics of the playground. If you spoil your ballot paper because you are not happy with Labour or don't like the Lib Dems, you are in effect voting Tory. No one counts spoilt ballot pappers, they just make your Tory candidate look more popular. That is your choice, but my Dad who was a staunch Tory voter once said "Spolit ballots are the politics of spoilt brats who are too immature to understand that politics is always about compromise and you are never voting for someone who is perfect". itotally agree. I feel the same about non voters who moan that "Voting changes nothing". If all of those who didn't vote actually bothered, we'd have a completely different set of politicians running the country.  Voting is a privelige that ony a few have on planet Earth. Use it wisely.

To recall the Chinese proverb. Brexit, Trump, Korea, Putin, Assad, Syria, etc, etc. We crtainly live in interesting times. 

Tuesday, 18 April 2017

Theresa May calls a general Election

Today Theresa May has called a general election. The Barnet Eye welcomes this move. It is a bold move and one that few expected. For many of us, it seems eminently sensible for Theresa May to seek a mandate for the Brexit negotiations. The Barnet Eye believes that good leaders are bold leaders. May has shown that she is not afraid to take risks. We do however believe that the country does not need a dose of hard right Tory dogma. As such, we will not be supporting the Conservative party. We desperately need a change of direction to brings fairer settlement for those at the margins.

Perhaps the biggest beneficiary of this poll is likely to be The Lib Dems. They have seen a massive resurgence following the Euro vote. In my constuency, Hendon, we have a hard right Brexiteer in Matthew Offord standing in a very pro remain seat. Labour held the seat until 2010, but were soundly trounced last time. Lib Dems were a distant third place. It will be fascinating to see what happens to Labour under Jeremy Corbyn. Whatever happens, we need a proper, functioning government and a proper opposition. They say a week is a long time in politics, What will the seven week campaign bring us. Another fascinating thing is UKIP. As they've achieved their purpose and we are leaving the EU, will they disappear?

My predictions?

Big Tory majority.
Lib Dem gains in pro remain areas 50ish seats
Labour reduced to core areas
SNP to maintain stranglehold on Scotland.
Greens to poll well
The Borough of Barnet to stay blue

Interesting times

What are your predictions?

Monday, 17 April 2017

Brexit Ten Months on. A look at how the Brexit campaigns lies have panned out

One of the better Conservative Councillors in the London Borough of Barnet is Gabriel Rozenberg. Gabriel is always polite and tends to try and make intelligent comments in Council and on Twitter. Unlike some of his (former) colleagues, he tends to think before shooting from the mouth.

So I was intrigued to see a tweet from him on the subject of Brexit


His tweet pretty much sums up my own views. The pound has consisitently been between 16-20% lower since the vote. This means that all of us are 16-20% worse off than our neighbours in the EU, USA etc. Perhaps the most surprising, for me, aspect of what has happened is that no one has a clue, nearly a year after the event, what it really means and what the settlement will be.

Last June I pulished a list of the Top Ten porkies told by the Brexit Campaign. Lets see how that has panned out?

Top Ten #Brexit Porkies

1. 70 Million Turks will come to Uk if we remain. The concept that the entire population of Turkey will relocate to Uk is clearly dishonest.

Rog Comment. This is what it always was. A load of B___cks. A year down the line, Turkey joining the EU is further, not closer. 

2. We will regain control of our borders. We already have control of borders. Everyone entering UK has to show a passport.
 
Rog Comment. We hear very little about controls on free movement of people. Immigration from EU countries does appear to have slowed as people get nervous about their future status. That is a totally different thing to "regaining control of borders". Interestingly it seems that the price of a trade deal with India is likely to be more immigration. 

3. If we quit EU Leave will spend an extra £360 mill a week on NHS. It will be up to govt of day to set budget and £360 mill figure excludes rebate we already receive.
 
Rog Comment. This was the big porkie. Few believed it then and even Nigel Farage admitted it was a porkie once the referendum was out of the way. Sadly the  NHS looks more at risk than ever.

4. If we leave EU #leave will scrap VAT on household energy. If this is done it will further reduce money available to put into NHS as described in point 3 and would be a matter for govt of day.
 
Rog Comment. I've not heard mention of this since the referendum finished. 

5. If we leave EU, the EU will automatically give us a preferential trade deal. This is pure speculation as know one knows what the final deal will be.
 
Rog Comment. A year on and none of us has a clue what the deal will be. Clearly if we don't know now, we certainly didn't know then.

6. If we leave EU, migration from EU will decrease. If we achieve a deal on same terms as Norway, this is not true. No one knows what deal we will get so cannot say.
 
Rog Comment. Well it seems that in the short term there has been a reduction, as people are nervous about commiting to a move in a time of uncertainty. Longer term? Who can really tell.

7. If we leave EU we could deport foreign criminals. This would be subject to a new treaty and may breach Europen Human rights laws. These are not written by EU.
 
Rog Comment. As I understand it, the first act of Parliament will be one to write all EU laws into British laws. They will be changed/amended later. Will this happen? Who knows, but I wouldn't put my money on it. 

8. A lower pound would be good for the economy. This is only true for net exporters with a strong manufacturing base. Sadly we do not have that.

Rog Comment. As I mentioned, there are some sectors of the economy which will prosper. Sadly we are also seeing a flight of jobs in the finance sector. The latest being Lloyds Bank, who are setting up a subsidiary in Berlin. Inflation is rising. Given that nothing has materially changed yet, apart from the exchange rate, it is really very hard to know how this will pan out.

9. The EU makes all our laws at present. It doesnt.
 
Rog Comment. This was nonsense then and it still is
 
10. The rest of the world will be keen to sign trade agreements with UK. No country has said this is true, whereas most say they want us to stay.
 
 Rog Comment. Well we've had a year. How many countries have said "we are queueing up to sign a trade deal with the UK". I'm not aware of a stream of trade delegations rushing to head the queue.
 
 It seems to me that the whole campaign was built on porkies. If you point these out #Leavers call you a remoaner, ignoring the factthey moaned for 42 years about the first referendum result. I suppose its only fair to also mention the ineptitude and porkies of the Cameron / Osborne lead remain campaign. They foolishly let the Leave campaign set the agenda. They never sold the benefits of EU membership and simply traded made up stats with Leavers. No one trusted Cameron or Osborne, who were seen as slippery. I for one shed no tears for their journey to the political wilderness.

Sunday, 16 April 2017

The tweets of the week 16/4/2017 in The London Borough of Barnet

Well, well, well - what have we got here then? It's our weekly fave - The Tweets of the week. What have our local twits been up to?


1. We start with Alan Wylie who looks at what could possibly go wrong with our unstaffed libraries


2. Just in case you were unsure of what area the Burnt Oak police patrol, they have helpfully tweeted a map. No surprises for guessing where its of!


3. Todays wildlife quiz question from Velella. Can anyone identify these?


4. Bit of a fire this week in Brent Cross. Looked a bit scary


5.Some great pictures of the Ionic Cinema in Golders Green from Richard Littler


6. Mill Hill is getting a new chippy! We can't wait! We've long missed La Carp D'Or


7.Live Music is always worth a plug. This time it's at Flames restaurant in Finchley!


8.Mark Amies is none too impressed with the neglect at Edgware Station


9. We love a well turned out garden in the spring?


10. And our local citizen of the year received his award at Mill Hill Music Complex


Thats all folks, have a great Easter Sunday!

Saturday, 15 April 2017

The Saturday list #125 - Great Technology in the London Borough of Barnet!

A special edition for Saturday list #125 - this number got me thinking of the Iconic Inter City 125 train, which passes through Mill Hill on the way to Nottingham, Derby, Sheffield and a host of other stations. Sadly, the trains don't stop in the Borough of Barnet, so we can only marvel at them as they whizz through!So I thought I'd do a little tour of some great technology that can be seen in our amazing Borough. Technology makes our life better, even if we whinge about it all the time.

1. The Intercity 125 train. Stand on any Thameslink platform and you'll see this iconic 1970's piece of technology whizz through. These beasts were supposed to be the future of Britains Railways, sadly for most of us, we've had decades of slow chug-a-lug suburban trains on a daily basis. I seem to recall they were called Inter City 125's as they did 125 MPH. That would get you into St Pancras from Mill Hill in 5 minutes! If I do it in 20 most days, I'm happy.  (credit to CHOO-CHOO!!Plane) for the video.



2.The Spitfire. Youc an see this at The RAF museum in Hendon, along with a whole stack of other great technology. The countries premier aircraft museum. (Credits -  aeroengpilot )




3.The Boris Bus. The future of London Buses? Well it was till Boris decided that being Mayor was beneath him! You can see these on the Saracens Match day service occasionally. Sorry that don't have a better picture



4. The National Institute for Medical Research. This is perhaps the most important building in the country! Or it was until it was decided to miove it to The Crick in St Pancras. A whole host of medical discoveries have benn made here. Ones which have changed the lives of millions for the better. It's also been used as a location for Batman films! See it before it gets knocked down

Image result for NIMR mill hill



5. The University of London Observatory. I love astronomy and the fact we've got a world class observatory in our locality!




Image result for uLU Observatory mill hill


6. The Ibanez Turbo Tube screamer! This technology makes a guitar rock! This to me as a guitarist, is technology at its best.

7. Brent Cross flyover. This for me as a kid was the future! Roads over roads over roads. I always love the view of the flyover from the tube as the sun is setting. It always seemed magical to me. I always particularly liked the street lighting.  A masterpiece of 1960's engenering and technology.

Image result for Brent Cross flyover


8. 4G football pitches. I play football on these every week at Powerleague in Mill Hill. They are great. Unlike the original plastic pitches, no carpet burns and a softer surfcase so less dodgy knees and broken ankles.

Image result for powerleague 4g pitches Mill Hill

9. Fridges. This may seem an odd thing to say, but there is no invention that has had more of an effect on our life than the humble fridge. Before fridges, we simply couldn't have all of the lovely food we eat on a daily basis. At the heart of every restaurant, every kitchen and every cafe is a fridge.

10. The Oyster card. I love contactless technology. It just makes life so much easier.  We use it all the time at our tube and train stations and on the buses. It has made a huge difference to the way we do our business. Like much technology, we take it for granted.


Whilst they are the least glamourous of all the ten things I've listed, in many ways fridges and Oyster cards are the type of applications that change the way we do things and how we live our lives more than anything else. It is perhaps humbling to think that whilst just about everyone in London has a fridge most of the earths population does not have access to refridgeration. The contactless card is something that keeps London moving. In many parts of the world however, the only means of getting from A to B is to walk for the population. Makes you realise how lucky we are.




Cricklewood Freight terminal update - Trains roll in without planning permission

In the London Borough of Barnet, there is one rule for ordinary citizens and another for powerful multinational commercial interests. The council is all to happy to employ hit teams of private contractors to rigorously enforce parking restrictions, which have often been introduced in completely arbitary ways, with zero thought for local residents and businesses. When it comes to big business and planning, it seems that they have no interest at all in enforcing their own rules, guidelines and procedures. There are dozens of examples of this, but perhaps the most brazen of all at present is what is happening on the railway lands in Cricklewood. There is a proposal, submitted to Barnet Council on Feb 28th, 2017 to build a rail freight terminal handling aggregates. The plan will see 10,000 tons of aggregates being handled every week, generating 9 lorries per hour. Full details of this is laid out in the Transport assessment. The hours of operation are (according to section 5.12 of this document) "It is planned that the business will operate 6 days per week Monday to Saturday, with operating hours of 6am to 6pm, however core hours are expected to be 7am to 5pm." The pattern is likely to be as follows "It is expected that there will be a fairly even spread of deliveries over the week, and in order to allow forvariation and provide a robust figure the 10 hour core operation has been used to predict the hourly traffic generation. This results in an average of 9 two way HGV trips per hour throughout each day. At this stage it is assumed that there will bea split of deliveries from the site, one third by 30 tonne capacity vehicles and two thirds by 20 tonne capacity vehicles. On this basis this is equivalent to 267 loads or 534 two way HGV trips". Amazingly, in section 6.19 they note that the effect of this traffic on the already congested Edgware road is as follows "The site is roposed for the transportation of aggregates by rail. The transport and highway impacts have been considered in this report and it has been concluded that the impacts will be negligible and that the proposal is compliant with national and local policies".

If you know the area, this map below shows the access plaan onto the Edgware Road, supporting the site.




This morning I yet again checked the status of the plan. When we first covered the subject, back in March, the local community were unaware. As a result of our first blog on the subject, there are now 64 letters of objection. As you can see, the plan is still in the pending consideration stage.

Status as per 15/04/2016



Loading, DB Cargo AG
Unloading the aggregates
So the site clearly is highly contentious, has not been granted planning permission and is talks are still under way. There are two issues about this whole thing which disturb me. The first is the arrogance of DB Rail (the railway company owned by The German Government which is proposing the site ) in stating that they can't be bothered to consult with the local population to mitigate the impact on their community. In the laughably titled "Statement of comunity involvement" para 3.1 they state "Given the very specific detailed technical operations proposed on site for the Railfreight Facility to deal with the transportation by rail of aggregate it was decided not to engage with the public directly. It was considered that there would be no benefit to either DB Cargo or the   general public from such a consultation. However, the application for a permanent RFF will be fully consulted upon". In plain English that translates to "We think the public are too think to understand the effect of 9 lorries an hour and the noise and dust generated by moving 10,000 tons of aggregates a week through their community". There is an interesting press release on the DB rail website showing how this sort of facility works. Looks pretty noisy/dusty to me.

It is clear just what the bosses of these companies think of the people who have to live with the effects of their profit making schemes. The arrogance is breathtaking. However if you think it is bad enough that they don't give a stuff about the ordinary people, their attitude to the law and the planning authority is even more shocking. Here for your perusal is a video that may interest you.



As you can see the depot has been built and there is a train with a set of wagons in the facility. The video was taken on Thursday 13/4/2017. It seems that DB Rail feel no need to actually get planning permission from the Council and follow due process, to build and start using the site. One has to ask, what is the purpose of having a planning process if companies simply ignore it and do what they like.  There are a few things I think do need to be said. Firstly, I support the concept of moving freight off the road and onto rail where possible. It is more eco friendly and sustainable than convoys of lorries, however this cannot be an excuse to ride roughshod over local communities and to ignore planning rules. There is absolutely no excuse to refuse to consult. In urban settings, such facilities should be housed in such a way to negate the effects of noise and dust. To claim that 10 lorries an hour will have no effect on traffic on the Edgware road is ridiculous. Anyone who drives, knows that Lorries move slower, accelerate slower and have to be given a wide berth. To me it seems that the access to the site is awful. I would assume that many will need to cross the Edgware road to get to the North Circular. This is ignored in the diagram. My assumption is one of the justifications for the aggregates is to supply the mega building project on the Brent Cross site. As such the site is on the wrong side of the railway, with a totally inappropriate road access. Of course DB rail has already said they consider local people to thick to understand such issues. I rather suspect that in Germany, such facilities are a tad "Vorsprung Durch Technic" and local people are not ridden roughshod over in such ways. Maybe that is why the UK is such a good place for foreign rail companies to make juicy profits?

I will give the last word to Jessica Howey, just one of 64 people to have objected to the proposal. I chose her objection at random as a fairly representative one. Jessica has requested the opportunity to speak at the planning meeting.

Comment: The transfer of aggregates in the open without cover from train to lorries using a mechanical grabber will create noise, dust, dirt and pollution and intolerable traffic on the Edgware Road, which is already heavily congested. This is totally unacceptable in the 21st century and makes a mockery of the London Mayor's attempts to improve the quality of air in London. It will also seriously affect the quality of life in the Railway Terraces Conservation area. There will also be considerable light pollution as the site will have 24 hour security and work will take place from 6am to 6 pm. The railway terraces and our allotments are very close to the proposed site but no screening or protection is proposed. However screening is proposed for the new flats in Fellows Square currently being marketed in the Far East by London estate agents. The Railway Terraces have been ignored by DB Cargo, which has an abysmal track record on the site in question where there have been many polluting and illegal fires. DB Cargo's past performance and failure to manage the site should dictate that this application is rejected outright.
...